Their Satanic Majesties Request Released: December 8, 1967
The Rolling Stones’ sixth studio album, was recorded in London in between February and October 1967. It is completely unlike anything else they ever recorded and continues to polarise opinion - is it a copycat response to Sgt Pepper, or a genuine reflection of an increasingly difficult year for a band in transition?
Their Satanic Majesties Request in depth
Imagine sitting down to hear this record for the first time. You last immersed yourself in a whole new Stones album 10 months ago, when you took Between The Buttons home. There were Dylan influences and some whimsical English psychedelia, but it songs like My Obsession and Miss Amanda Jones anchored it with a recognisably Rolling Stones sound. You knew where you were.
But when you put the needle to the groove of Their Satanic Majesties Request , something odd occurred. Something very odd indeed. You were greeted by a piano playing outside of the normal pentatonic scale, and were then hit by a sliding wall of brass. You checked the spinning label – had some jester put an Ornette Coleman record in your Stones’ sleeve for a laugh? But then a massed choir of voices kicked in, led by Mick Jagger and with John Lennon and Paul McCartney’s among them; and it was clear this really was The Stones - just a Stones unlike any sort of Stones you had ever heard before, or ever would again.
Some people like to put forward the proposition that Their Satanic Majesties Request is some sort of huge psychedelic joke, a weak-chinned cousin to The Beatles’ super-buff Sgt Pepper. If it is, then it’s one that is still not only pretty funny, but, on occasion, extremely charming too. It might go on a bit, it might try and get away with the same punch line two or three times; it might crib shamelessly from the cultural world that inspired it and which it reflects; but, if you can’t find pleasure in at least half of Their Satanic Majesties Request then, really, you’re taking the whole thing way too seriously.
“There's two good songs on it: She's A Rainbow, and 2000 Light Years from Home. The rest of them are nonsense... I think we were just taking too much acid. We were just getting carried away, just thinking anything you did was fun and everyone should listen to it. ”
Mick Jagger, 1967
- 1 of 3
- next
Consider, for example, Gomper. As records of their time go, this is in the premier league:
“By the lake with lily flowers,” Jagger sings over Brian Jones’ sitar and Mellotron, “Wile away the evening hours…”
You know how this is going to go already, don’t you? Flattened, Pink Floyd-like harmonies, a wildly-wafting flute (also Jones), some chuck-it-in-when-you-like tabla from Watts, a guitar line that sounds like a hungry mouse begging for a peanut. The words drop away at 1:43, the track goes on, building ever higher and more portentous for another three and a half minutes. It is elegant and clever and stupid and self-indulgent, all at the same time – entirely Gomeperdelic, in fact, the authentic ’67 sound – or one of them anyway.
If you have a problem with “silly” you’ll be in trouble here. In Another Land is Bill Wyman’s stab at psychedelic other-worldliness – and Wyman, chap that he undoubtedly is, is one of the least psychedelic men of all time. Think of it as Piper At The Gates Of Yawn (the snoring at the end is his, but it may also be yours). Citadel has a tumultuous great churn of a riff driving it, but it’s one interrupted by sonar blips and backwards guitar noodling, both of which conspire to derail it.
Then there’s the eight plus minutes of the second version Sing This All Together which is a freeform(less) jam. It’s experimental and forward-looking, certainly. But is it any good? No, not really. It’s not freaky enough for a proper freak out, nor tuneful enough to have any sort of retro appeal.
2000 Man imagines the turn of the century and the changes that will follow – “I am having an affair with a random computer,” Jagger sings – but it relies on two not really very amazing ideas where one great one would have sufficed. On With The Show – posh accent and all – repositions Yellow Submarine’s graceful Victoriana in a theatre setting, but it’s not somewhere you’d want to visit more than once.
But then, for all that carping, there are some moments of absolute colossal genius too. She’s A Rainbow positively reverberates with joy – Nicky Hopkins’ piano dancing around the piece, his music-box arpeggios tickling up against John Paul Jones’ skittish strings.
And 2000 Light Years From Home is powerful and magical and dark and genuinely futuristic. That syncopated riff over those choppy strings? That’s trip-hop 25 years ahead of the curve. This is a vision of the bleakest ends of space written two years before man even reached the moon, while the lyrics cast you out further and further, you’re 100, then 600, then 2000 light years away.
Legend has it Mick wrote the words during the night he spent incarcerated in Brixton gaol on drugs charges at the end of June, in the middle of the Summer Of Love so beloved of sixties apologists and fantasists. (Its alternative title is, of course, the Summer Of Drugs). Having been nabbed with four amphetamine tablets, Mick Jagger was about to metamorphose from archetypal pampered and privileged pop princeling into a symbolic Counter Cultural butterfly that the Establishment would attempt to break upon the wheel of the legal system. The party was already over, had the beautiful young things but known it; and perhaps in this song Mick Jagger is among the first to acknowledge that what goes up must come down, and that there were some serious bills in the post for those who had spent so much time getting high. It was an unpopular view at the time, doubtless; but a realistic one for anyone locked behind bars on a trumped up possession charge. “It’s so very lonely,” indeed.
Is Their Satanic Majesties Request as bad as some people say? Definitely not. Does it teeter on the edge of unlistenability at times? Oh yes, more than once. Does it wear its heart on its (wizard’s) sleeve? Absolutely, sometimes ruinously so. Is it a messy, trippy, fucked-up, high-as-a-kite, pop-royalty-in-residence anomaly? Yes, yes it is; and it deserves just a little bit more love, if only for that.





Comments (9)
“actually this is one of my favourite albums and always has been just listen to it in 2010 and reflect it makes me fell connected to an old but great idea ...you guess the rest!”
Submitted by neville (not verified) on Sun, 2010-11-14 11:04.“I was wondering why its taken off the market on amazon it seems like its the only stones album to be taken off ”
Submitted by Jeff (not verified) on Wed, 2010-10-20 00:48.“I listened to this album in 1967 , i was 12 years young and i am still listening to it, I,m 55 now and i think it is one of there greatest creations, I guess you had to grow up in the sixties, i was there for the British invasion and so glad I was these young kids have no idea what is was like !!( wheres that joint? )”
Submitted by Jim (not verified) on Sun, 2010-07-25 02:28.“I think this album is, in the end, a very good one. Don't look it through Exile-Sticky-Banquet's eyes, and you will find an astonishing production, and great, very great, solo playing of the boys. Charlie (the intro of 2000 man is so irregular and creative), Keith (The lantern), Nicky (he is "the man" on the album), Brian (Gomper) and Mick develop so good lyrics and great singing. Bill do what he always do best, keep steady bass lines, which is not easy!
Submitted by Diego Ortiz (not verified) on Sat, 2010-07-10 17:18.Forget about the Pepper-thing. All the good bands at this time were making psychedelic records (The Who sell out), and not reaching a good point as the Stones did. When I didn't like the early seventies albums, Between the Buttons and Magesties were my favourites ones. She's a rainbow and all that stuff.”
“R.e. She's a Rainbow: The line "she combs her hair" is pretty bogus or at least tongue in cheek. Instrumentals are great.”
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-07-01 22:35.“Satanic majesties was ,no doubt, in part a reaction to sgt.pepper. Anyone who says its rubbish is either lying or hasn't listened to it properly.I for one regard it as easily more listenable and indeed better than any stones album after 1978.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-06-17 16:13.It has two bona-fide classics in 'She's a rainbow' and '2000 light years from home', but it has other good tunes too. 'Citadel' is a corker,full of unusual guitar,and '2000 man' and Bill Wymans 'In another land' are both charming and catchy. For sure 'Gomper' and 'Sing this all together(see what happens)' go on a bit and the latter in particular smacks of filler. The stones single of around this time,the fantastic and under-rated 'We love you' would have slotted in beautifully as closing track of side one instead.
Overall i think 'Majesties' scrapes into the top ten of all stones albums and is definitely their most unusual. Undoubtably a reflection of its,now magical seeming,times- i would not hesitate to recommend it to any stones fan (although many will undoubtably think i'm bonkers). Indeed many stones fans,particularly the poor mis-guided souls who think the best stones work is all post 1970 will hate it. Like me, you should pity them- nearly all the stones 60's output is magnificent and 'Satanic majesties' earns it place among them.”
“I always felt this album had more in common with The Mothers of Invention's Freak Out than Sgt Pepper. Sing This All Together ~ Return of the Son of the Monster Magnet. Always felt Majesties was more accessible than Pepper. Pepper, while fantastic, is very sterile, I can't relate to that music. I think the album title "Satanic Majesties" was a very unfortunate decision and it hurt sales in the US. My mother would not let me bring the thing into the house, we were a good church-going family like so many American families.”
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2010-05-20 11:40.“Love "She's a Rainbow" (Nicky Hopkins). :)
”
Submitted by Elssa (not verified) on Wed, 2010-05-19 01:54.“I was just listening to "She's a Rainbow" .. haven't heard it in ages. It's so beautiful, especially the piano parts (Nicky Hopkins). The whole thing is a real classic - just awesome.
www.elssa1.blogspot.com
”
Submitted by Elssa (not verified) on Wed, 2010-05-19 01:52.What do you think?